Chrysler Pacifica 2006 vs Nissan Murano 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.5 - 4.0 | 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 - 257 HP | 234 - 248 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 - 355 NM | 318 - 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 7.9 - 8.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 13.8 | 10.6 - 12.3 | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Murano. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is larger. Chrysler Pacifica is 28 cm longer than the Nissan Murano, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 923 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2250 litres | 2005 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Pacifica has 553 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Murano. This could mean that the Chrysler Pacifica uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Pacifica (by 245 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Murano. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`293 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Murano has
| |