Chrysler LHS 1998 vs Volvo S80 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 257 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 348 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Chrysler LHS is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler LHS engine produces 117 HP more power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 58 NM more than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Chrysler LHS reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 6.4 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler LHS consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler LHS could require 675 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chrysler LHS is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler LHS is 46 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler LHS is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1106 litres | |
|
Chrysler LHS has more luggage capacity. Chrysler LHS has 90 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler LHS has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |