Chrysler LHS 1998 vs Mazda Xedos 9 1993
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 257 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 348 NM | 216 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Chrysler LHS is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler LHS engine produces 87 HP more power than Mazda Xedos 9, whereas torque is 132 NM more than Mazda Xedos 9. Thanks to more power Chrysler LHS reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 9.4 | |
The Mazda Xedos 9 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler LHS consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler LHS could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
730 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
Mazda Xedos 9 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.28 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
Chrysler LHS is larger. Chrysler LHS is 46 cm longer than the Mazda Xedos 9, 12 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler LHS is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 430 litres | |
Chrysler LHS has more luggage capacity. Chrysler LHS has 100 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 9. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 1`940 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler LHS has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |