Chrysler LHS 1998 vs Chrysler Concorde 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 257 HP | 228 HP | |
| Torque: | 348 NM | 301 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler LHS is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler LHS engine produces 29 HP more power than Chrysler Concorde, whereas torque is 47 NM more than Chrysler Concorde. Thanks to more power Chrysler LHS reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 10.3 | |
|
The Chrysler Concorde is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler LHS consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Concorde, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler LHS could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Concorde gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 5.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler LHS and Chrysler Concorde are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 530 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler LHS has
|
Chrysler Concorde has
| |