Chrysler LHS 1998 vs Chrysler Concorde 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.5 | 2.7 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 - 257 HP | 203 - 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 348 NM | 258 - 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 - 11.3 | 10.1 - 10.8 | |
|
Chrysler LHS petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Concorde. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.27 m | 5.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler LHS is 1 cm shorter than the Chrysler Concorde, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler LHS is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`100 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler LHS has
|
Chrysler Concorde has
| |