Chrysler Crossfire 2004 vs BMW Z4 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
|
BMW Z4 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Crossfire engine produces 13 HP less power than BMW Z4, but torque is 10 NM more than BMW Z4. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Crossfire reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW Z4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Crossfire consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Crossfire could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Crossfire consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW Z4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Crossfire might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.30 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Crossfire is 3 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 105 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
190 litres | no data | |
|
BMW Z4 has more luggage space. Chrysler Crossfire has 195 litres less trunk space than the BMW Z4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 0.5 metres more than that of the BMW Z4, which means Chrysler Crossfire can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Crossfire has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |