Chrysler Crossfire 2004 vs Mercedes SLK 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.2 | 1.8 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 - 335 HP | 163 - 360 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 - 420 NM | 240 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 - 6.5 seconds | 4.9 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 11.0 | 8.7 - 12.0 | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.30 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Crossfire is 3 cm shorter than the Mercedes SLK, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 105 litres | 208 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
190 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes SLK has more luggage space. Chrysler Crossfire has 103 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`695 | ~ 1`761 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |