Chrysler Crossfire 2004 vs Honda S2000 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler Crossfire is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Honda S2000 is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 3.2 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 - 335 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 - 420 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 - 6.5 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 11.0 | 9.9 | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda S2000. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.28 m | |
| Chrysler Crossfire is 8 cm shorter than the Honda S2000, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 105 litres | 143 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
190 litres | no data | |
|
Honda S2000 has more luggage space. Chrysler Crossfire has 38 litres less trunk space than the Honda S2000. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 0.5 metres less than that of the Honda S2000, which means Chrysler Crossfire can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`695 | ~ 1`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Crossfire has
|
Honda S2000 has
| |