Chrysler Crossfire 2004 vs BMW Z4 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 3.2 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 218 - 335 HP | 150 - 231 HP | |
Torque: | 310 - 420 NM | 200 - 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 - 6.5 seconds | 5.9 - 8.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 11.0 | 7.5 - 9.5 | |
Chrysler Crossfire petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW Z4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.06 m | 4.09 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.32 m | 1.30 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Crossfire is 3 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 105 litres | 300 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
190 litres | 260 litres | |
BMW Z4 has more luggage space. Chrysler Crossfire has 195 litres less trunk space than the BMW Z4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW Z4 (by 70 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 0.5 metres more than that of the BMW Z4, which means Chrysler Crossfire can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`695 | ~ 1`567 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 8000 | 8600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Crossfire has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |