Chrysler Crossfire 2004 vs Audi TT 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Chrysler Crossfire is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 3.2 | 1.8 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 218 - 335 HP | 150 - 250 HP | |
Torque: | 310 - 420 NM | 210 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 - 6.5 seconds | 6.4 - 8.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 11.0 | 8.2 - 11.0 | |
Chrysler Crossfire petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi TT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.06 m | 4.04 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.32 m | 1.35 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Crossfire is 2 cm longer than the Audi TT, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 105 litres | 220 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
190 litres | no data | |
Audi TT has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Crossfire has 115 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. This could mean that the Chrysler Crossfire uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 0.3 metres more than that of the Audi TT. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`695 | ~ 1`737 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 8000 | 5200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi TT has
| |