Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs Dodge Intrepid 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 228 HP | 228 HP | |
| Torque: | 301 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Dodge Intrepid is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Concorde and Dodge Intrepid have the same engine power, but Chrysler Concorde torque is 4 NM less than Dodge Intrepid. Chrysler Concorde reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.7 | |
|
The Dodge Intrepid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Concorde consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Intrepid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Concorde could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chrysler Concorde is 10 cm longer than the Dodge Intrepid, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 520 litres | |
| Chrysler Concorde has 10 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Intrepid. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
Dodge Intrepid has
| |