Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs Chrysler LHS 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 228 HP | 257 HP | |
| Torque: | 301 NM | 348 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler LHS is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Concorde engine produces 29 HP less power than Chrysler LHS, whereas torque is 47 NM less than Chrysler LHS. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Concorde reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 10.9 | |
|
The Chrysler Concorde is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Concorde consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler LHS, which means that by driving the Chrysler Concorde over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Concorde gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 5.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Concorde and Chrysler LHS are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 530 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
Chrysler LHS has
| |