Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 NM | 256 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Chrysler Concorde and Chrysler 300M have the same engine power, but Chrysler Concorde torque is 2 NM more than Chrysler 300M. Chrysler Concorde reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.5 | |
| Chrysler Concorde consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that by driving the Chrysler Concorde over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chrysler Concorde is 28 cm longer than the Chrysler 300M, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
| |