Chrysler Concorde 1993 vs Dodge Intrepid 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.3 - 3.5 | 2.7 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 218 HP | 163 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 - 300 NM | 245 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 - 11.3 | 9.1 - 10.6 | |
|
Chrysler Concorde petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dodge Intrepid. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.15 m | 5.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Concorde and Dodge Intrepid are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | 520 litres | |
|
Dodge Intrepid has more luggage space. Chrysler Concorde has 47 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Intrepid. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Intrepid has
| |