Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Chrysler Concorde 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 254 HP | 237 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 8 seconds | |
| Chrysler 300M engine produces 17 HP more power than Chrysler Concorde, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Chrysler Concorde. Despite the higher power, Chrysler 300M reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 10.8 | |
| Chrysler 300M consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Concorde, which means that by driving the Chrysler 300M over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Chrysler 300M is 28 cm shorter than the Chrysler Concorde, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300M has
|
Chrysler Concorde has
| |