Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Chevrolet Impala 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 254 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300M is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 300M engine produces 77 HP more power than Chevrolet Impala, whereas torque is 62 NM more than Chevrolet Impala. Thanks to more power Chrysler 300M reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 9.2 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300M consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Impala, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300M could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
| Chrysler 300M is 8 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300M is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | no data | |
| Chrysler 300M has 5 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300M has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |