Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Chevrolet Impala 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 | 3.4 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 - 254 HP | 177 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 - 340 NM | 278 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 10 seconds | 7 - 10 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 - 10.7 | 9.2 - 10.2 | |
|
Chrysler 300M petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Impala. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
| Chrysler 300M is 8 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300M is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | no data | |
| Chrysler 300M has 5 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`120 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |