Chrysler 200 2015 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 355 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler 200 engine produces 6 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC, but torque is 5 NM more than Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.3 | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 200 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 200 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage space. Chrysler 200 has 79 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`092 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |