Chrysler 200 2015 vs Chevrolet Impala 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 309 HP | |
| Torque: | 355 NM | 358 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler 200 engine produces 15 HP less power than Chevrolet Impala, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Chevrolet Impala. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.7 | |
| Chrysler 200 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Impala, which means that by driving the Chrysler 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler 200 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler 300C, Jeep Wrangler | Used also on Chevrolet Camaro, Chevrolet Equinox | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
| Chrysler 200 is 23 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage space. Chrysler 200 has 79 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`092 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |