Chrysler 200 2010 vs Mazda 6 2012

 
Chrysler 200
2010 - 2014
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 175 HP192 HP
Torque: 225 NM256 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds7.8 seconds
Chrysler 200 engine produces 17 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 31 NM less than Mazda 6.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.86.3
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chrysler 200 consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 200 could require 525 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
820 km on highway1240 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 360'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 18 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring, Jeep CompassInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler 200 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mazda 6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.87 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.48 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 200 and Mazda 6 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 390 litres489 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage space.
Chrysler 200 has 99 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Chrysler 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data7000
Pros and Cons: Chrysler 200 has
Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv