Chrysler 200 2014 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler 200 engine produces 23 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC. Due to the lower power, Chrysler 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.8 | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 200 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 200 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage space. Chrysler 200 has 79 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`092 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |