Chrysler 200 2014 vs Chevrolet Impala 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler 200 engine produces 3 HP more power than Chevrolet Impala, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Chevrolet Impala. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.1 | |
| Chrysler 200 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Impala, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 200 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Impala engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Renegade | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Impala engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
| Chrysler 200 is 23 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage space. Chrysler 200 has 79 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`092 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |