Chrysler 200 2010 vs Lexus LS 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler 200 is available only with front wheel drive, while Lexus LS can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 (petrol) | 4.6 - 5.0 (petrol, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 - 287 HP | 370 - 394 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 - 353 NM | 473 - 520 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 9.3 seconds | 5.7 - 6.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 10.2 | 9.3 - 11.6 | |
|
Chrysler 200 petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Lexus LS. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 5.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chrysler 200 is smaller, but slightly higher. Chrysler 200 is 29 cm shorter than the Lexus LS, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler 200 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 510 litres | |
|
Lexus LS has more luggage space. Chrysler 200 has 120 litres less trunk space than the Lexus LS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Lexus LS, which means Chrysler 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`115 | ~ 2`582 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Lexus LS has
| |