Chrysler 200 2014 vs Kia Optima 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler 200 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Kia Optima has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chrysler 200 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Optima can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 (petrol) | 1.7 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 - 300 HP | 68 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 - 355 NM | 189 - 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 9 seconds | 7.4 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.2 | 1.6 - 8.3 | |
|
Chrysler 200 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Optima. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chrysler 200 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 200 is 3 cm longer than the Kia Optima, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 510 litres | |
|
Kia Optima has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler 200 has 47 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima. This could mean that the Chrysler 200 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Kia Optima, which means Chrysler 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`141 | ~ 2`077 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Kia Optima has
| |