Chrysler 200 2014 vs Chevrolet Malibu 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chrysler 200 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Malibu can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 - 300 HP | 197 - 259 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 - 355 NM | 259 - 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 9 seconds | 6.7 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.2 | 8.8 - 9.5 | |
|
Chrysler 200 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Malibu. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 200 is 2 cm longer than the Chevrolet Malibu, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 200 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 461 litres | |
| Chrysler 200 has 2 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Malibu. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`141 | ~ 1`875 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Chevrolet Malibu has
| |