Chrysler 200 2014 vs Chevrolet Impala 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chrysler 200 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Impala can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 | 2.4 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 - 300 HP | 184 - 309 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 - 355 NM | 233 - 358 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.2 | 8.1 - 10.7 | |
|
Chrysler 200 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Impala. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
| Chrysler 200 is 23 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage space. Chrysler 200 has 69 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`141 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |