Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Opel Mokka 2012

 
Chevrolet Trax
2013 -
Opel Mokka
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.7 Diesel1.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 130 HP130 HP
Torque: 300 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds9.6 seconds
Chevrolet Trax and Opel Mokka have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.54.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km5.6 l/100km
The Opel Mokka is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Trax over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle1140 km in combined cycle
1300 km on highway1310 km on highway
860 km with real consumption960 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.25 m4.28 m
Width: 1.78 m1.78 m
Height: 1.67 m1.66 m
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Trax is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 356 litres356 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1372 litres
Turning diameter: no data10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8881`959
Safety:
Opel Mokka is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 84009600
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Trax has
  • lower price
Opel Mokka has
  • higher children safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv