Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Trax engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Trax is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Trax consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Trax over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.63 m | |
| Chevrolet Trax is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Chevrolet Trax has 28 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`888 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |