Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Peugeot 3008 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Trax engine produces 30 HP more power than Peugeot 3008, but torque is 40 NM less than Peugeot 3008. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Trax reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Trax consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Trax could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Trax consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Trax is 2 cm shorter than the Peugeot 3008, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1604 litres | |
|
Peugeot 3008 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Trax has 76 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`884 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Trax scores higher in safety tests. The Peugeot 3008 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Peugeot 3008 has
| |