Chevrolet Tahoe 1999 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.8 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 278 HP | 282 HP | |
| Torque: | 393 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 4 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 47 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.1 | 16.2 | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Tahoe over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Tahoe engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger. Chevrolet Tahoe is 10 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2920 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 0.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`085 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |