Chevrolet Tahoe 1999 vs Ford Excursion 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.0 Petrol | 5.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 305 HP | 325 HP | |
| Torque: | 481 NM | 745 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford Excursion, whereas torque is 264 NM less than Ford Excursion. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.7 | 13.0 | |
|
The Ford Excursion is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Excursion, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Tahoe could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 167 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1670 km on highway | ||
| Ford Excursion gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 5.76 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.96 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is smaller. Chevrolet Tahoe is 71 cm shorter than the Ford Excursion, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 1359 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2920 litres | 4145 litres | |
|
Ford Excursion has more luggage space. Chevrolet Tahoe has 899 litres less trunk space than the Ford Excursion. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Excursion (by 1225 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`085 | 4`037 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Ford Excursion has
| |