Chevrolet Tahoe 2000 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 4.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 69 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 3 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Tahoe reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.4 | 12.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 16.0 l/100km | 14.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Tahoe could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 96 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Tahoe engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Express, Chevrolet Suburban | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Tahoe might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Tahoe engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Tahoe is 16 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2920 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`084 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |