Chevrolet Tahoe 2000 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 137 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 157 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Tahoe reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.4 | 11.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 16.0 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Tahoe could require 600 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Tahoe engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Express, Chevrolet Suburban | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Tahoe might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger. Chevrolet Tahoe is 34 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 18 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2920 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`084 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |