Chevrolet Spark 2015 vs Opel Karl 2015

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Chevrolet Spark
2015 -
Opel Karl
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 (petrol)1.0 (petrol, lPG)

Performance

Power: 98 HP75 HP
Torque: 127 NM95 - 96 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds13.9 - 14.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.14.3 - 4.6
Chevrolet Spark petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Karl.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.64 m3.68 m
Width: 1.60 m1.60 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Spark is 4 cm shorter than the Opel Karl, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 313 litres206 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
771 litres1013 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Spark has 107 litres more trunk space than the Opel Karl. The Opel Karl may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Karl (by 242 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.5 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 0.3 metres less than that of the Opel Karl.
Gross weight (kg): no data~ 1`372
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

above average
Average price (€): no datano data
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Spark has
  • only petrol engines available
  • roomier boot
Opel Karl has
  • petrol and LPG engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv