Chevrolet Nubira 2005 vs Mazda 3 2006

 
Chevrolet Nubira
2005 - 2009
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 122 HP105 HP
Torque: 161 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds11 seconds
Chevrolet Nubira is more dynamic to drive.
Chevrolet Nubira engine produces 17 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Nubira reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.57.2
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km7.9 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chevrolet Nubira consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Nubira could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Nubira consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
960 km on highway910 km on highway
720 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.49 m
Width: 1.72 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Nubira is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Nubira is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1285 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Nubira is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Chevrolet Nubira can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1931`710
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 20002400
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Nubira has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv