Chevrolet Nubira 2005 vs Mazda 3 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Nubira is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Nubira engine produces 17 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Nubira reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Nubira consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Nubira could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Nubira consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Chevrolet Nubira is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Nubira is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 675 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Nubira is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`193 | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Nubira has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |