Chevrolet Nubira 2005 vs Kia Cerato 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.8 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 122 HP | 105 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 - 161 NM | 143 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 11.6 seconds | 9 - 10.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 9.1 | 7.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Chevrolet Nubira petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Cerato. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Nubira is 2 cm longer than the Kia Cerato, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Nubira is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 345 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Nubira is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Cerato. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`181 | ~ 1`314 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Nubira has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |