Chevrolet Malibu 2015 vs Jaguar XJ 2015

 
Chevrolet Malibu
2015 -
Jaguar XJ
2015 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 124 HP240 HP
Torque: 175 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds7.9 seconds
Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 116 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 165 NM less than Jaguar XJ.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.18.4
The Chevrolet Malibu is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chevrolet Malibu consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Malibu over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 49 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Malibu) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XJ) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.92 m5.26 m
Width: 1.85 m1.90 m
Height: 1.47 m1.46 m
Chevrolet Malibu is smaller, but slightly higher.
Chevrolet Malibu is 33 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 447 litresno data
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): 1`568no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data26 000
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Malibu has
  • lower fuel consumption
Jaguar XJ has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv