Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 vs Mazda 3 2003

 
Chevrolet Lacetti
2005 -
Mazda 3
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 122 HP105 HP
Torque: 165 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds11 seconds
Chevrolet Lacetti is more dynamic to drive.
Chevrolet Lacetti engine produces 17 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Lacetti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.47.2
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km7.8 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chevrolet Lacetti consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Lacetti could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Lacetti consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway910 km on highway
720 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption
Chevrolet Lacetti gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.49 m
Width: 1.73 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Lacetti is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Lacetti is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 405 litres413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data675 litres
Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Lacetti has 8 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. This could mean that the Chevrolet Lacetti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: no data10.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`6951`675
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 12001000
Rating in user reviews: 6.8/10 8.2/10
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Lacetti has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv