Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 vs Fiat Stilo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Lacetti engine produces 6 HP more power than Fiat Stilo, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Fiat Stilo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 7.6 | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Lacetti consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Lacetti could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Aveo, Chevrolet Cruze, Chevrolet Nubira | Used also on Fiat Doblo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Lacetti might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.57 m | |
| Chevrolet Lacetti is 6 cm longer than the Fiat Stilo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Lacetti is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1410 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`765 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Lacetti has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |