Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 vs Mazda 3 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.8 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 - 122 HP | 105 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 - 165 NM | 145 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 11.6 seconds | 9 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 8.8 | 5.0 - 8.2 | |
|
On average, the Chevrolet Lacetti petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Lacetti is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Lacetti is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1225 litres | 675 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`682 kg | ~ 1`718 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`191 kg | ~ 1`208 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 491 kg | ~ 510 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Lacetti has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |