Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 vs Mazda 3 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.8 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 - 122 HP | 105 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 - 165 NM | 145 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 11.6 seconds | 9 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 8.8 | 5.0 - 8.2 | |
|
On average, the Chevrolet Lacetti petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Lacetti is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Lacetti is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 675 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Lacetti has 8 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. This could mean that the Chevrolet Lacetti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`682 | ~ 1`718 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Lacetti has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |