Chevrolet Kalos 2007 vs Mazda 2 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Kalos engine produces 14 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Kalos reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.5 | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Kalos consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Kalos could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos is smaller. Chevrolet Kalos is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1044 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Kalos has 92 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Kalos has serious deffects in 135 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Kalos has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |