Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 83 - 94 HP | 64 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 - 130 NM | 125 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 12.1 seconds | 10.2 - 18.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 7.6 | 4.7 - 7.8 | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
| Chevrolet Kalos is 22 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 438 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 789 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Chevrolet Kalos has 63 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Kalos is 0.7 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Chevrolet Kalos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`654 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Kalos has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |