Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Ford Fiesta 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Chevrolet Kalos
2005 - 2006
Ford Fiesta
2003 - 2005
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 (petrol)1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 83 - 94 HP68 - 150 HP
Torque: 123 - 130 NM106 - 204 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.1 - 12.1 seconds8.4 - 15.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.0 - 7.64.3 - 7.5
Chevrolet Kalos petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.00 m3.92 m
Width: 1.67 m1.68 m
Height: 1.50 m1.46 m
Chevrolet Kalos is 8 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 375 litres268 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data945 litres
Chevrolet Kalos has more luggage capacity.
Chevrolet Kalos has 107 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fiesta.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`100~ 1`538
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Kalos has
  • only petrol engines available
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Ford Fiesta has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv