Chevrolet Kalos 2005 vs Ford Fiesta 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.4 (petrol) | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 83 - 94 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 123 - 130 NM | 106 - 204 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 12.1 seconds | 8.4 - 15.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 7.6 | 4.3 - 7.5 | |
Chevrolet Kalos petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.00 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
Chevrolet Kalos is 8 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Kalos is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 268 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 945 litres | |
Chevrolet Kalos has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Kalos has 107 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`538 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Kalos has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |