Chevrolet Impala 2013 vs Chrysler 300C 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 309 HP | 305 HP | |
| Torque: | 358 NM | 358 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Impala engine produces 4 HP more power than Chrysler 300C, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 11.2 | |
| Chevrolet Impala consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Impala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 5.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chevrolet Impala is 7 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 462 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Impala has 70 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |