Chevrolet Impala 2013 vs Ford Mustang 2014
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 309 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Impala engine produces 125 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 174 NM less than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Impala) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.38 m | |
| Chevrolet Impala is 33 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 408 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Impala has 124 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Impala is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 28 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |