Chevrolet Impala 2013 vs Chrysler 200 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 187 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 234 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Impala engine produces 3 HP less power than Chrysler 200, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Chrysler 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.5 | |
| Chevrolet Impala consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 200, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Impala over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Impala engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Renegade | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Impala engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
| Chevrolet Impala is 23 cm longer than the Chrysler 200, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 453 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Impala has 79 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Impala is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`092 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |