Chevrolet Impala 2013 vs Chrysler 300C 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Impala is available only with front wheel drive, while Chrysler 300C can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 | 3.6 - 6.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 - 309 HP | 286 - 476 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 - 358 NM | 340 - 637 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 10.7 | 10.2 - 13.0 | |
|
Chevrolet Impala petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 300C. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chevrolet Impala is 6 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 462 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Impala has 70 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |