Chevrolet Impala 2013 vs Hyundai Elantra 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Impala is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Hyundai Elantra has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 | 1.6 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 - 309 HP | 132 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 - 358 NM | 158 - 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 10.7 | 6.1 - 7.1 | |
|
Chevrolet Impala petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Elantra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is larger. Chevrolet Impala is 58 cm longer than the Hyundai Elantra, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Impala is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 419 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Impala has 113 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Elantra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Impala is 1.2 metres more than that of the Hyundai Elantra, which means Chevrolet Impala can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Hyundai Elantra has
| |