Chevrolet Impala 2013 vs Chrysler 200 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Impala is available only with front wheel drive, while Chrysler 200 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 | 2.4 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 - 309 HP | 187 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 - 358 NM | 234 - 355 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.5 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 10.7 | 8.5 - 10.2 | |
|
Chevrolet Impala petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
| Chevrolet Impala is 23 cm longer than the Chrysler 200, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 463 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Impala has 69 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Impala is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`141 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |